wormhole’s posterous

The Consequences are Tragic
 
There is no monopoly on extremism. The wing-nuts are both left and the
right. Many of us have been saying for years (I've been saying it for over
40 years) that differences between parties and the wing-nuts on both the
left and the right are so miniscule to be barely noticeable.
 
Politics and Political campaigns are a scam. Voting is invariably
a vote AGAINST someone, for a personality or an amorphous idea, i.e.
"change and hope."
 
Politics is public relations and benefits accrue to the over-lords; the
wealthy and the privileged class. It is a con game and apparently it
works.
 
Hank Roth
 
----------------
 
The Bloodthirsty Left, Extreme Rhetoric, and Murder
 
AIM Column | By Cliff Kincaid | June 15, 2009
 
The Wright comments undercut the left-wing campaign to depict Von Brunn as
a right-winger and blame conservatives for inspiring him.
 
James Von Brunn, who believed that "Obama does what his Jew owners tell
him to do," attacked the Holocaust Museum and killed a guard on the same
day it was being reported on a national basis that Obama's former pastor
Jeremiah Wright had said that "Them Jews ain't going to let him [Obama]
talk to me." It sounded as if they were reading from the same tract.
 
The Wright comments undercut the left-wing campaign to depict Von Brunn as
a right-winger and blame conservatives for inspiring him. It seems like
Von Brunn's anti-Semitic views are shared by some on the political left,
even those backing and very close to Obama himself.
 
Wright had actually made the statement one day earlier, on June 10, to
David Squires of the Daily Press of Newport News, Virginia. Wright also
said the "Jewish vote" and the "AIPAC vote," referring to the American
Israel Public Affairs Committee, are "controlling" him, and that Obama was
in danger of becoming a "puppet."
 
If Von Brunn's anti-Semitism is shared by Jeremiah Wright, a left-winger
who was Obama's pastor for 20 years, then anti-Semitism is not a
right-wing phenomenon. That is why the attempts by various "progressives"
to blame the Holocaust Museum murder on the right-wing are political
nonsense and flat-out dishonest.
 
As veteran investigator Herbert Romerstein points out, anti-Semitism is a
condition that affects the left as well. In fact, he points out that "Some
Weather Underground activists were born into Jewish families, but they
were as anti-Semitic as their gentile born colleagues." Their
anti-Semitism seems to have been an outgrowth of their anti-Americanism.
They despise Israel because it is an ally of the United States.
 
This is critical because Weather Underground terrorists Bill Ayers and
Bernardine Dohrn were also political associates and backers of Barack
Obama. The wall outside Ayers' university office depicts Israel as an
imperialist lackey of the U.S., as an "American-made missile" falls on
"Palestinian youth."
 
However, Joan Walsh of the far-left Salon.com has reportedly been on MSNBC
trying to blame "extreme right-wing rhetoric" for the murder at the
Holocaust Museum. She decries this "ugly rhetoric." This claim reminded me
of something that one of her staffers had written personally to me several
weeks ago.
 
I had asked Glenn Greenwald of Salon.com about his acceptance of an "Izzy"
award named after communist and Soviet agent-of-influence I.F. Stone, and
what he would say of the article in Commentary magazine about new evidence
linking Stone to Soviet intelligence.
 
Part of Greenwald's response was an attack on Commentary. He said, "The
fact that Stone is being smeared by the likes of the consummately
chicken-hawk, nepotistic, bloodthirsty Podhoretz family and the truly
deranged, sex-obsessed, conspiracy-monger Cliff Kincaid will make me place
my Izzy Award on an even more prominent shelf in my office."
 
The term "sex-obsessed" was apparently a reference to my opposition to
giving special rights to practitioners of the homosexual lifestyle. It
turns out that Greenwald is gay and has a "lover" in Brazil but I didn't
know that at the time. I hadn't thought about commenting on the
"bloodthirsty" comment until the attack on the Holocaust Museum and the
controversy over whether anti-Semitism is a right- or left-wing
phenomenon, and whether right-wingers are too "extreme."
 
Norman Podhoretz is the editor-at-large of Commentary and the author of
the book World War IV: The Long Struggle Against Islamofascism. He was not
one of the authors of the piece on I.F. Stone in Commentary, and his
family had nothing to do with writing it. The authors were John Earl
Haynes, Harvey Klehr, and Alexander Vassiliev. Haynes and Klehr are
historians and Vassiliev is a Russian journalist who worked for the Soviet
KGB.
 
Members of AIM who had received our AIM Report on this matter have
been encouraged to contact Joan Walsh, editor-in-chief of Salon.com,
with postcards that read:
 
  Dear Ms. Walsh:
 
  One of your bloggers, Glenn Greenwald, reacted with vile
  insults when questioned about his acceptance of an award named after
  Soviet agent I.F. Stone. Why would a staffer for Salon.com accept
  such an award? If there is any doubt in your mind about Stone's
  service to the old Soviet Union, we suggest you consult the new book,
  Spies, by Haynes, Klehr, and Vassiliev. The section on Stone begins
  on page 126, in the chapter titled "The Journalist Spies." Does
  Greenwald also believe that Soviet spy Alger Hiss was innocent of the
  charges against him? Would he accept an Alger Hiss award? What would
  be your opinion on that?
 
  Note that Greenwald's natural impulse, in response to an article in
  Commentary attacking his icon, was to smear Podhoretz as
  "bloodthirsty." This speaks volumes about the "rhetoric" of the left.
 
  What makes this even more interesting is where the Greenwald comments
  ended up first. Before I even had a chance to comment, they surfaced
  on the blog of someone named Jane Hamsher, who advertises herself as
  "the author of the best-selling book Killer Instinct" and the producer
  of such films as "Natural Born Killers."
 
  Directed by Oliver Stone, "Natural Born Killers" is about two
  psychopathic killers who thrive on media attention. The two characters
  "travel across Route 666 conducting psychedelic mass-slaughters not
  for money, not for revenge, just for kicks," noted one review.
 
  I'll never forget Jeff Cohen, the founder of Fairness and Accuracy in
  Reporting (FAIR) -and the one who would subsequently give Greenwald
  his "Izzy"-once telling me that he rejected Stone's idea of holding a
  fundraiser for FAIR by showing the film "Natural Born Killers" because
  he found it too gruesome.
 
  Hamsher's Killer Instinct book is said to be the story of how she came
  to be involved in "Natural Born Killers." Defenders of the film said
  it was a commentary on media violence. But it inspired real life acts
  of violence. Indeed, a study, The Influence of Technology, Media, and
  Popular Culture on Criminal Behavior, found that the 1994 movie was
  linked to a dozen murders and the 1999 Columbine school massacre (the
  killers who killed 12 students and wounded another 24 were reportedly
  fans of the film). The academic study was by Jacqueline Helfgott, an
  associate professor at Seattle University who specializes in "the
  criminogenic effects of pop culture."
 
  A lawsuit was filed, Byers v. Edmondson, alleging that Sarah Edmondson
  and her boyfriend, Benjamin Darrus, went on a crime spree after
  watching the film. The suit claimed that the film producers were
  liable to the victims for distributing a film "which they knew or
  should have known would cause and inspire people" to acts of violence
  by "glorifying" such violence and "treating individuals who commit
  such violence as celebrities and heroes."
 
  The suit was filed on behalf of Patsy Byers, who was shot during an
  armed robbery of a convenience store where she worked in Ponchatoula,
  Louisiana. As a result of the shooting, Patsy Byers was rendered a
  paraplegic. Another victim was William Savage, who was murdered. The
  suit was dismissed when a court ruled that there was no evidence that
  the producers of the film had knowingly intended to incite violence.
 
  But in an affidavit, Edmondson admitted that "During the two weeks
  prior to the robbery and shooting of Mr. Savage on March 7, 1995 and
  the robbery and shooting of Mrs. Byers on March 8, 1995, Benjamin
  Darrus [and] I watched Natural Born Killers several time[s] in
  Oklahoma. We also ingested a quantity of LSD, a hallucinogen, during
  this time. Had we not seen the movie repeatedly we would not have
  taken a gun. It wouldn't have occurred to me. As well, had we not been
  under the influence of LSD; we never would have left Oklahoma. The
  movie did have a numbing influence concerning the effects of violence
  and a desire to experience it. The shooting did not take place as much
  from a need for money as from a desire to experience the power of
  violence."
 
  Despite her proud role in producing "Natural Born Killers," Hamsher
  wants us to believe she is against real-life violence and thinks that
  the right-wing should be blamed for the attack on the Holocaust
  Museum. She is recommending as a TV guest somebody named David Neiwert
  who has written a book on How Hate Talk Radicalized the Radical Right.
 
  "If any media folks need contact info for David, drop me a line," she
  said. BINGO. Just like that, he was on Anderson Cooper's CNN show on
  June 12.
 
  Neiwert runs his own website called "Crooks and Liars." This seems
  somehow appropriate.